South Africa

Read the evidence.

Zero flags. The article is well constructed by this methodology's standards: substantive Prehistory and Pre-colonial sections (Khoisan, Bantu expansion, Mapungubwe, the Venda kingdoms) precede European contact; colonial violence carries named actors — 'Dutch traders also brought thousands of enslaved people', 'intensified British subjugation of the indigenous peoples', British scorched-earth tactics and concentration camps named as such; African military agency is preserved (Sekhukhune defeating the Boers, the Zulu victory at Isandlwana); the Mfecane is partly attributed to European colonization rather than the Zulu-blame narrative; and the etymology already presents the parallel names Mzansi and Azania with their origins correctly stated. Two residual observations that no current category covers, recorded for methodology triage: the asymmetric labeling of Xhosa movement in their own historic frontier as 'raids' and 'incursions' while colonist movement is 'expansion', and the Anglo-Boer War passage's count of Boer concentration-camp deaths with no mention of the roughly 20,000 Black African camp deaths — an omission, which no quote-anchored category can flag.